Swiss federal authorities

FAQ and Series

24 documents
24 documents found. You are viewing page 3 from 3 pages.
  • Progressions of the Accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima Dai-ichi

    One very crucial difference between the two accidents concerns the structural designs of the reactors.

  • ENSI Report on Fukushima IV: Radiological Effects

    Nine months after the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, Japan is working to contain radiation exposure in the region of the accident. The challenges confronting the country in this endeavour are shown by the new ENSI report on the radiological effects of the accident on 11 March 2011.

  • ENSI Report on Fukushima III: Lessons Learned

    The analysis of the accidents at Fukushima confirms that Swiss nuclear plants are safe. However, the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) has identified a variety of findings (Lessons Learned) from Fukushima which should now be utilised to continue optimising the safety of Switzerland’s nuclear power plants.

  • ENSI Report on Fukushima I: Event sequences (Chronology)

    Immediately after the first live images of the accident in the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant were broadcast all over the world on 11 March 2011, the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) convened a group of internal experts comprising engineers, geophysicists, nuclear physicists and psychologists. This interdisciplinary “Japan Team” was assigned the task of…

  • Comparison with Chernobyl

    The International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) is used to classify safety-related events in nuclear plants on a scale from 1 to 7.

  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about the Accident in Japan

    What happened at Fukushima Dai-ichi was a major nuclear accident, as was also the case at Chernobyl. However, there are significant differences between the two events: at Chernobyl, the nuclear chain reaction went out of control, and power increased abruptly by a factor of several hundred.