Leibstadt and Beznau nuclear power plants can withstand infrequent severe earthquakes
Both Leibstadt and Beznau nuclear power plants have shown that, in the event of or after a very severe earthquake, they can ensure that their reactors are stable and safe. Dose values of one or 100 millisievert which have to be complied with will not be exceeded even after earthquakes that are only to be expected every 1,000 or 10,000 years respectively.
In 2016, the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) set new requirements for the seismic hazard of Swiss nuclear power plants (NPP). These new guidelines take into account the latest scientific findings. In 2016, ENSI decreed that NPP operators must demonstrate in three steps that their plants can withstand extremely infrequent severe earthquakes:
Step 1: Update earthquake safety proof by the end of 2018
Step 2: Update probabilistic safety analysis by the middle of 2019
Step 3: Submit extended deterministic safety proof by September 2020
Step 1: NPP operators were obliged to update their existing deterministic proofs of earthquake safety by the end of 2018. The operators had drawn up such proofs in 2012 following the reactor accident in Fukushima. Among other things, operators of NPPs had to demonstrate that their plants are capable of withstanding a 10,000-year earthquake without any released radiation exceeding a dose limit of 100 millisievert.
Step 2: The operators were obliged to update their probabilistic safety analyses (PSA) by the middle of 2019. A PSA is used to quantify the risk of beyond design basis accidents (in German). For example, the frequencies of nuclear damage or releases needed to be demonstrated.
Step 3: The operators were obliged to submit an extended deterministic earthquake proof to ENSI by autumn 2020. In addition to the 10,000-year earthquake (accident category 3), this also includes the 1,000-year earthquake (accident category 2) with a dose limit of one millisievert be complied with. In addition, more detailed methods for determining the earthquake capacities of important components must be used for this proof. ENSI had already defined the requirements for the extended proof in a note in 2014.
The last step for the Mühleberg, Leibstadt and Beznau nuclear power plants has already been approved
ENSI examined the submitted and updated documents in detail. In 2021, ENSI approved step 1 (deterministic proof of earthquake safety in accident category 3) for all NPPs. In 2022, ENSI approved step 2 (probabilistic safety analysis) for all NPPs.
The review of the documents submitted by the Beznau and Leibstadt NPPs demonstrated that both the core cooling and the cooling of the fuel ponds of the two NPPs are ensured in the event of very severe earthquakes, as are expected to occur every 1,000 or 10,000 years. This is also the case for a combination of earthquakes and earthquake-induced flooding. The dose values of one or 100 millisievert which have to be shown to be complied with, would not be exceeded after such an accident.
In the course of its reviews, ENSI has, in respect of certain points, identified a need for improvement and highlights challenges in its statements which, do not, however, fundamentally call into question the overall results of the proof cases carried out and which are to be followed up within the framework of its ongoing oversight.
In the third and final step of the verification process, NPP operators had to provide very detailed and methodologically demanding deterministic earthquake safety proofs for accident categories 2 and 3. These included technical and radiological analyses. As a minimum, the following earthquake effects had to be taken into account: ground vibration, ground settling, landslides, destruction of nearby facilities that could endanger the safety of the nuclear installation, loss of non-earthquake-resistant systems, fire and flooding.
During the years 2001 to 2004, the NPP operating companies investigated the seismic hazard at the NPP sites in greater depth as part of the PEGASOS project (probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the NPP sites in Switzerland). The procedure was carried out in accordance with SSHAC Level 4, which is the highest and thus most demanding stage of an internationally recognised procedure.
Following the completion of the PEGASOS project, significant seismic data was collected nationally and worldwide, and seismological models were developed. With the aim of reducing the scatter of hazard results by taking into account new data and models, the nuclear power plant operators launched the “PEGASOS Refinement Project” (PRP) in 2008. The main focus of the refinements was on new release reductions laws and site-specific foundation investigations.
In May 2016, ENSI implemented the results referred to as “Seismic Hazard Assumptions ENSI-2015”. At the same time, ENSI asked NPP operators to assess the impact on the safety of the plant and, in particular, on the risk. For this purpose, in respect of earthquakes, the safety proofs required by ENSI after the Fukushima reactor disaster in March 2011 were required to be updated by the end of 2018, and the probabilistic safety analysis was required to be submitted by the middle of 2019, while the extended deterministic accident analysis was required to be submitted by the end of September 2020. ENSI has now largely completed its comments on this.
Based on the findings from the safety proofs of the last two decades, improvements have been continuously derived that have increased the robustness of the NPPs against the impacts of earthquakes.
ENSI takes note of the decision to operate Beznau NPP up to 2033
ENSI takes note of Axpo’s decision to operate Beznau 1 Nuclear Power Plant until 2033 and Beznau 2 Nuclear Power Plant until 2032. Beznau NPP has an open-ended operating licence, as is the case for all Swiss NPPs. Subject to safety being guaranteed, the operator is free to make a commercial decision about how long…
News, Posts
2023 Oversight Report: The safety status of the nuclear power plants is good
ENSI verified the status of the Swiss nuclear power plants by 327 inspections. In 2023, the year under review, 22 reportable nuclear-safety-relevant incidents were recorded at the nuclear power plants. ENSI provides detailed information in the oversight report published today.
News, Posts
The Spanish regulatory authority and ENSI in talks on radiation protection
From 6 to 8 May 2024, a delegation from the Spanish regulatory authority visited ENSI. Discussions focused on the topic of radiation protection, in particular exchanging of experience relating to the Leibstadt NPP and to the Mühleberg NPP, which is currently being dismantled.
News, Posts
Integrated Oversight: ENSI updates safety indicators
Based on oversight experience, ENSI has reviewed the safety indicators introduced within the framework of integrated oversight.
News, Posts
WENRA’s statement on the importance of nuclear safety in the context of the current energy crisis
At its November 2022 plenary meeting, WENRA discussed the consequences of the current energy crisis on regulatory activities and issued a statement which highlights the importance of nuclear safety in this new challenging context.
News, Posts
Ukraine crisis takes centre stage at 66th IAEA General Conference
The 66th General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) took place in Vienna from 26 to 30 September 2022. The focus was on global nuclear safety and security as well as challenges arising from the Ukrainian crisis.
Background articles, News, Posts
New study on extreme flooding of the River Aare is also relevant for nuclear power plant sites
Today, the Federal Office of the Environment, FOEN, published its study “Extreme Flooding of the River Aare”. Their findings also include a re-evaluation of the flood risk to nuclear installations located on the Aare. ENSI will now require those nuclear installations concerned to update their safety cases.
Background articles, News, Posts
All Swiss nuclear power plants comply with the updated earthquake safety standards
For the second time since the Fukushima accident in 2011, power plant operators have demonstrated that their plants are capable of withstanding an extremely rare, severe earthquake. The safety case for a flood caused by an earthquake has also been checked. The findings from the safety proofs generated in the aftermath of Fukushima have been…
News, Posts
IAEA Director General receives an insight into Swiss backfitting philosophy
ENSI experts gave the Head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, a guided tour of the Beznau nuclear power plant during a working visit to Switzerland. Grossi was given a picture of the continuous improvements made to nuclear safety as laid down in the Vienna Declaration, in the setting of the Beznau…
